Market Insights · Companies · canon.jp

canon.jp

Corporate (non-industry)
🌐 canon.jp📍 Ota
11K
Domains · #908
0%
Market share
+0.7%
30-day growth
+77
Domains · 30d
-
Control panel
Domain flow 30 days · DNS
+23
Gained
−14
Lost
+9
Net
Where clients come from · top sources
Where domains go · top destinations
gmo.jp−1
Geographic footprint top markets
🇯🇵Japan77%
🌐Rest of world22%
Top TLDs by domains
.co.jp46%
.jp25%
.com20%
.or.jp3%
.net1%
.org0%
Infrastructure footprint measured by webhosting.today · 2026-09-02
78.1%
On own network
129
Median days tracked
Where client domains actually run · top networks by domains
FINE - Canon IT Solutions Inc., JP own78.1%
XSERVER Xserver Inc., JP6.7%
SAKURA-C SAKURA Internet Inc., JP2.4%
AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US2.3%
GMO-I-R1 - GMO Internet, Inc., JP2%
Signals & news latest
No news tagged for this company yet.
Company details
HeadquartersOta
Total domains11K
Market rank#908
Company facts
Legal formkabushiki gaishaWikidata · 2026-08
CityOtaWikidata · 2026-08
SEC CIK0000016988Wikidata · 2026-08
ISINJP3242800005Wikidata · 2026-08
Employees194151Wikidata · 2026-08
Revenue3,401B yenWikidata · 2026-08
Stock exchangeNew York Stock ExchangeWikidata · 2026-08
FoundersTakeshi MitaraiWikidata · 2026-08
SubsidiariesCanon (Netherlands), Canon (United States), Canon (United Kingdom), Canon (Canada), Canon Marketing Japan, Canon Medical Systems CorporationWikidata · 2026-08
Member ofLinux Foundation, Wi-Fi Alliance, SD Association, Wireless Power Consortium, Camera & Imaging Products AssociationWikidata · 2026-08
Industryelectrical industryWikidata · 2026-08
Network & infrastructure
Own networkAS4678our analysis · 2026-08
Traffic level1-5GbpsPeeringDB · 2026-08
Network scopeRegionalPeeringDB · 2026-08
Peering policySelectivePeeringDB · 2026-08
IPv6 readyYesPeeringDB · 2026-08
PeeringDBnet/7660
Similar companies

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.