Top hosting groups

Brands rolled up to their controlling owner. Domains aggregated across every subsidiary, reseller brand and acquired property.

Groups tracked

across 224+ brands

31.6%

Top 5 share of market

17.9%

Largest group · GoDaddy

503

Concentration (HHI)

fragmenting

Groups by domains under management brands rolled up

Domains Share Brands 30d 90d trend

1 G

GoDaddy 71.1M 17.9% 3 −1.5%

2 U

United Internet / IONOS 20.6M 5.2% 12 −1.2%

3 N

Namecheap 15.8M 4% 2 −3%

4 N

Newfold Digital 11.6M 2.9% 12 −0.6%

5 T

team.blue 6.7M 1.7% 41 −0.5%

6 G

group.ONE 3.5M 0.9% 12 −1%

7 R Runiti 3.3M 0.8% 4 −5.2%

8 Y

your.online 3.0M 0.8% 29 −0.5%

9 G

GMO Internet 3.0M 0.7% 6 −6.8%

10 I

Identity Digital 2.8M 0.7% 2 +1.2%

11 A

Aruba S.p.A. 2.3M 0.6% 2 −0.7%

12 T

Tucows 1.9M 0.5% 5 −8.7%

13 N

Netowl / XServer 1.7M 0.4% 3 +3.4%

14 W

World Host Group 1.0M 0.3% 11 +1.9%

15 T

Team Internet 853K 0.2% 8 −0.9%

16 M

Miss Group 821K 0.2% 15 +0%

17 M

Markmonitor Group 799K 0.2% 2 +10.7%

18 V

VentraIP Australia 604K 0.2% 2 −0.6%

19 N Namespace 515K 0.1% 7 +0%

20 C

cyber_Folks 379K 0.1% 4 −0.7%

21 I

InMotion Hosting 368K 0.1% 2 +0.9%

22 D DNC Holdings 265K 0.1% 2 +5.1%

23 H

HostPapa 252K 0.1% 6 +5.1%

24 N

NetArt Group 189K 0.1% 5 −3.8%

25 H

Hostway 163K 0% 3 +7.5%

26 I

iomart Group 141K 0% 4 +1.9%

27 L

LH.pl 134K 0% 4 +0.1%

28 C CloudOne Digital 103K 0% 2 +10.3%

29 E Enix Group 76K 0% 2 −0.2%

30 S SiteTech Group 35K 0% 2 +3.1%

31 T

Telia 34K 0% 2 +3.3%

32 X XBT Holding 32K 0% 2 +21.2%

33 L LiquidNet 23K 0% 4 +1.5%

34 F

Filanco 21K 0% 2 −1.9%

Market concentration share of tracked domains

GoDaddy17.9%

United Internet / IONOS5.2%

Namecheap4%

Newfold Digital2.9%

team.blue1.7%

group.ONE0.9%

All other groups61.3%

Most acquisitive brands rolled up

team.blue41 brands

your.online29 brands

Miss Group15 brands

United Internet / IONOS12 brands

Newfold Digital12 brands

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.