Top hosting groups

Brands rolled up to their controlling owner. Domains aggregated across every subsidiary, reseller brand and acquired property.

Groups tracked

across 226+ brands

30%

Top 5 share of market

17.3%

Largest group · GoDaddy

504

Concentration (HHI)

consolidating

Groups by domains under management brands rolled up

Domains Share Brands 30d 90d trend

1 G

GoDaddy 74.8M 17.3% 3 +2.2%

2 U

United Internet / IONOS 20.6M 4.8% 12 −0.8%

3 N

Namecheap 15.8M 3.7% 2 +3.7%

4 N

Newfold Digital 11.5M 2.7% 12 −1%

5 T

team.blue 6.7M 1.6% 41 −0.6%

6 R Runiti 3.5M 0.8% 4 −0.3%

7 G

group.ONE 3.5M 0.8% 12 +0.2%

8 G

GMO Internet 3.2M 0.8% 6 +3.5%

9 I

Identity Digital 3.0M 0.7% 2 +0.8%

10 Y

your.online 3.0M 0.7% 29 −0.5%

11 A

Aruba S.p.A. 2.3M 0.5% 2 −0.2%

12 T

Tucows 2.0M 0.5% 5 −0.3%

13 N

Netowl / XServer 1.8M 0.4% 3 +0.6%

14 W

World Host Group 1.0M 0.2% 11 −0.8%

15 T

Team Internet 837K 0.2% 8 −1.2%

16 M

Markmonitor Group 834K 0.2% 2 +0.5%

17 M

Miss Group 821K 0.2% 15 −0.8%

18 V

VentraIP Australia 637K 0.2% 2 +2.2%

19 N Namespace 523K 0.1% 7 −0.1%

20 C

cyber_Folks 382K 0.1% 4 −0.5%

21 I

InMotion Hosting 353K 0.1% 2 −1.8%

22 D DNC Holdings 265K 0.1% 2 −0.6%

23 H

HostPapa 246K 0.1% 6 −1.1%

24 N

NetArt Group 186K 0% 5 −1.8%

25 H

Hostway 163K 0% 3 −0.3%

26 I

iomart Group 140K 0% 4 −0.8%

27 L

LH.pl 137K 0% 4 −0.2%

28 C CloudOne Digital 98K 0% 2 −2%

29 E Enix Group 76K 0% 2 −0.6%

30 J

JetHostUnited States 45K 0% 2 −0.3%

31 X XBT Holding 39K 0% 2 +5.4%

32 T

Telia 36K 0% 2 −0.3%

33 S SiteTech Group 36K 0% 2 +0.2%

34 L LiquidNet 23K 0% 4 −0.6%

35 F

Filanco 19K 0% 2 −5%

Market concentration share of tracked domains

GoDaddy17.3%

United Internet / IONOS4.8%

Namecheap3.7%

Newfold Digital2.7%

team.blue1.6%

Runiti0.8%

All other groups63.2%

Most acquisitive brands rolled up

team.blue41 brands

your.online29 brands

Miss Group15 brands

United Internet / IONOS12 brands

Newfold Digital12 brands

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.