Top hosting groups

Brands rolled up to their controlling owner. Domains aggregated across every subsidiary, reseller brand and acquired property.

Groups tracked

across 226+ brands

30.7%

Top 5 share of market

17.6%

Largest group · GoDaddy

507

Concentration (HHI)

consolidating

Groups by domains under management brands rolled up

Domains Share Brands 30d 90d trend

1 G

GoDaddy 73.2M 17.6% 3 +0.4%

2 U

United Internet / IONOS 20.7M 5% 12 −0.6%

3 N

Namecheap 15.3M 3.7% 2 −4.1%

4 N

Newfold Digital 11.6M 2.8% 12 −1.5%

5 T

team.blue 6.8M 1.6% 41 +0.1%

6 R Runiti 3.5M 0.8% 4 −0.1%

7 G

group.ONE 3.5M 0.8% 12 −0.5%

8 G

GMO Internet 3.1M 0.8% 6 −2%

9 Y

your.online 3.0M 0.7% 29 −0.7%

10 I

Identity Digital 3.0M 0.7% 2 +0.8%

11 A

Aruba S.p.A. 2.3M 0.6% 2 +0.2%

12 T

Tucows 2.0M 0.5% 5 −0.4%

13 N

Netowl / XServer 1.7M 0.4% 3 +0.3%

14 W

World Host Group 1.0M 0.3% 11 −1.2%

15 T

Team Internet 848K 0.2% 8 −2.4%

16 M

Markmonitor Group 830K 0.2% 2 +0%

17 M

Miss Group 828K 0.2% 15 −0.2%

18 V

VentraIP Australia 624K 0.2% 2 −0.2%

19 N Namespace 523K 0.1% 7 +0%

20 C

cyber_Folks 384K 0.1% 4 +0.1%

21 I

InMotion Hosting 360K 0.1% 2 −1.5%

22 D DNC Holdings 266K 0.1% 2 −1.3%

23 H

HostPapa 249K 0.1% 6 −1.2%

24 N

NetArt Group 189K 0.1% 5 −1.7%

25 H

Hostway 164K 0% 3 −0.7%

26 I

iomart Group 141K 0% 4 −0.8%

27 L

LH.pl 137K 0% 4 +0.3%

28 C CloudOne Digital 100K 0% 2 −1.8%

29 E Enix Group 76K 0% 2 −0.4%

30 J

JetHostUnited States 45K 0% 2 +3.9%

31 X XBT Holding 37K 0% 2 −4.2%

32 T

Telia 36K 0% 2 +3.3%

33 S SiteTech Group 36K 0% 2 +0.4%

34 L LiquidNet 23K 0% 4 −1%

35 F

Filanco 20K 0% 2 −3.3%

Market concentration share of tracked domains

GoDaddy17.6%

United Internet / IONOS5%

Namecheap3.7%

Newfold Digital2.8%

team.blue1.6%

Runiti0.8%

All other groups62.3%

Most acquisitive brands rolled up

team.blue41 brands

your.online29 brands

Miss Group15 brands

United Internet / IONOS12 brands

Newfold Digital12 brands

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.