.bg - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇧🇬

.bg

ccTLD zone

62K

Zone size

708

Operators

Highly concentrated

Concentration

Top operators in .bg by domains in the zone

1 S

superhosting.bgTeam Blue 30K.bg domains +0%

2 C

cloudflare.comindependent 11K.bg domains +3.1%

3 G

gotobg.netindependent 910.bg domains −1.6%

4 C

cscglobal.comindependent 858.bg domains +1.8%

5 S

siteground.netindependent 780.bg domains −0.9%

6 A

Amazon Route 53independent 744.bg domains +1.5%

7 H

hostinger.comindependent 743.bg domains −0.7%

8 W

wix.comindependent 704.bg domains −2.2%

9 S

server.comindependent 703.bg domains +2%

10 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 552.bg domains +4.5%

11 J

jumphosting01.comindependent 521.bg domains +7%

12 V

vps.netindependent 498.bg domains −1%

13 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 479.bg domains +0.8%

14 C

coolicehost.comindependent 451.bg domains +1.1%

15 N

netim.netindependent 436.bg domains −2.2%

16 S

sitedns.netindependent 431.bg domains +0.2%

17 J

jethosting.comindependent 427.bg domains +24.9%

18 J

jumphosting03.comindependent 380.bg domains −0.8%

19 A

azure-dns.comindependent 363.bg domains +1.7%

20 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 327.bg domains −1.2%

21 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 324.bg domains −1.2%

22 H

hetzner.deindependent 305.bg domains −7.3%

23 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 297.bg domains −1.7%

24 V

vercel.comindependent 289.bg domains +8.6%

25 C

cloudns.netindependent 284.bg domains −0.4%

26 D

DNS.comindependent 253.bg domains −1.9%

27 D

digitalocean.comindependent 246.bg domains −0.4%

28 C

cloud.google.comindependent 241.bg domains +0%

29 N

nsone.netindependent 239.bg domains +5.8%

30 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 211.bg domains +0%

31 A

akamai.netindependent 210.bg domains −1.9%

32 G

gandi.netYour Online 198.bg domains −1%

33 N

ns.deindependent 189.bg domains +26.8%

34 N

nameshield.netindependent 179.bg domains −10.1%

35 E

eurodns.comNamespace 178.bg domains −0.6%

36 F

Fruits.coindependent 161.bg domains +4.5%

37 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 159.bg domains −4.8%

38 I

internetx.comUnited Internet 152.bg domains −1.9%

39 W

websupport.skTeam Blue 151.bg domains +2%

40 R

41 M

microsoft.comindependent 129.bg domains +3.2%

42 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 129.bg domains −1.5%

43 D

do-ex.comindependent 128.bg domains +4.9%

44 D

domeny.tvindependent 126.bg domains −1.6%

45 W

webcentral.com.auWorld Host Group 125.bg domains −1.6%

46 M

missgroup.comMiss Group 119.bg domains −2.5%

47 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 112.bg domains −3.4%

48 H

he.netindependent 107.bg domains +0%

49 B

brandshelter.comTeam Internet 100.bg domains +1%

50 W

webglobe.skGroup One 95.bg domains +0%

51 P

Ports.netindependent 93.bg domains +1.1%

52 G

gransy.comindependent 91.bg domains −1.1%

53 I

it.netindependent 80.bg domains −1.2%

54 R

regzone.czindependent 79.bg domains +1.3%

55 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 74.bg domains −5.1%

56 A

a1.netindependent 72.bg domains −4%

57 S

safebrands.frindependent 70.bg domains −1.4%

58 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 67.bg domains −9.5%

59 S

safenames.comindependent 65.bg domains +0%

60 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 63.bg domains +1.6%

61 I

inwx.chindependent 62.bg domains −3.1%

62 M

managed-ip.comindependent 62.bg domains +1.6%

63 U

ultradns.netindependent 62.bg domains −3.1%

64 R

regery.netindependent 58.bg domains −10.8%

65 W

webhouse.skindependent 57.bg domains −1.7%

66 L

lemarit.deindependent 53.bg domains −1.9%

67 B

bosch.deindependent 51.bg domains +0%

68 S

supremeservers.comindependent 51.bg domains −3.8%

69 I

iptwins.netindependent 50.bg domains −2%

70 S

serveriai.ltindependent 50.bg domains +0%

71 C

combell.euTeam Blue 49.bg domains −10.9%

72 W

WordPress.comindependent 49.bg domains +0%

73 T

thewaltdisneycompany.comindependent 48.bg domains −2%

74 G

GigaServer.czindependent 47.bg domains +2.2%

75 C

contabo.netindependent 47.bg domains −4.1%

76 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 46.bg domains +2.2%

77 D

dipcon.comindependent 46.bg domains +0%

78 C

cyberfolks.plCyberfolks 44.bg domains +0%

79 S

shopmania.orgindependent 43.bg domains −4.4%

80 Q

quic.cloudindependent 42.bg domains +5%

81 C

cprapid.comindependent 42.bg domains +2.4%

82 I

icp100.netindependent 41.bg domains +17.1%

83 I

is-fun.netindependent 40.bg domains +0%

84 P

papaki.grTeam Blue 39.bg domains +0%

85 T

Tilda.ruindependent 39.bg domains −2.5%

86 H

hostingukraine.uaindependent 39.bg domains −4.9%

87 D

dm.deindependent 36.bg domains −7.7%

88 N

nadns1.frindependent 36.bg domains +0%

89 H

home.plUnited Internet 36.bg domains −2.7%

90 R

romarg.comindependent 35.bg domains −2.8%

91 N

nazwa.plNetart 34.bg domains +0%

92 N

nominus.comindependent 34.bg domains +3%

93 O

openprovider.nlindependent 33.bg domains +0%

94 N

nestle.comindependent 33.bg domains +0%

95 A

afraid.orgindependent 31.bg domains −11.4%

96 B

barbero.co.ukindependent 31.bg domains +0%

97 N

namespace.geindependent 30.bg domains +3.4%

98 FfastcometWorld Host Group 29.bg domains +3.6%

99 T

TLD.plindependent 29.bg domains −3.3%

100 W

wpx.netindependent 29.bg domains −3.3%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

62K

.bg now

+441

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1ns.de+26.8%

2jethosting.com+24.9%

3icp100.net+17.1%

4vercel.com+8.6%

Losing ground

1afraid.org−11.4%

2combell.eu−10.9%

3regery.net−10.8%

4nameshield.net−10.1%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.