.ma - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇲🇦

.ma

ccTLD zone

84K

Zone size

567

Operators

Moderate

Concentration

Top operators in .ma by domains in the zone

1 H

heberjahiz.comindependent 12K.ma domains −3%

2 C

cloudflare.comindependent 11K.ma domains +4.4%

3 H

hostinger.comindependent 8K.ma domains −6.7%

4 M

menara.maindependent 8K.ma domains −0.6%

5 N

nindohost.netindependent 7K.ma domains +2.5%

6 C

capconnect.comindependent 5K.ma domains −0.1%

7 D

DNS.comindependent 5K.ma domains −4.4%

8 A

adk-media.comindependent 3K.ma domains −1.2%

9 Y

youcan.shopindependent 2K.ma domains −11.1%

10 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 2K.ma domains −8.9%

11 2

20i.comindependent 2K.ma domains −3.6%

12 H

heberfacile.netindependent 1K.ma domains −1%

13 W

wanacorp.comindependent 1K.ma domains +0.8%

14 O

o2switch.netYour Online 1K.ma domains −3.4%

15 C

cscglobal.comindependent 791.ma domains −1.2%

16 O

ovh.comindependent 730.ma domains −0.8%

17 V

vercel.comindependent 681.ma domains +7.4%

18 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 591.ma domains −4.2%

19 P

planethoster.netindependent 550.ma domains −2%

20 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 503.ma domains −5.8%

21 G

gandi.netYour Online 472.ma domains −4.3%

22 N

nsone.netindependent 461.ma domains +9%

23 A

Amazon Route 53independent 427.ma domains −0.5%

24 W

wix.comindependent 414.ma domains −4.6%

25 L

lwsdns.comindependent 370.ma domains −2.9%

26 I

infomaniak.chindependent 337.ma domains +0.6%

27 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 279.ma domains +2.2%

28 C

contabo.netindependent 278.ma domains −7%

29 W

webcentral.com.auWorld Host Group 265.ma domains −1.5%

30 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 264.ma domains −4.7%

31 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 256.ma domains −4.1%

32 N

netim.netindependent 253.ma domains −11.8%

33 N

networksolutions.comNewfold Digital 247.ma domains −3.9%

34 N

nameshield.netindependent 230.ma domains −13.2%

35 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 217.ma domains −7.3%

36 D

digitalocean.comindependent 206.ma domains −7.2%

37 A

azure-dns.comindependent 204.ma domains −3.8%

38 E

eurodns.comNamespace 200.ma domains +0.5%

39 M

microsoft.comindependent 199.ma domains −2.9%

40 T

thundercloud.ukindependent 180.ma domains −2.7%

41 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 169.ma domains −1.2%

42 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 152.ma domains −3.2%

43 S

safebrands.frindependent 140.ma domains −3.4%

44 S

siteground.netindependent 140.ma domains −6.7%

45 C

cloud.google.comindependent 138.ma domains +9.5%

46 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 136.ma domains −2.9%

47 N

nordnet.comindependent 114.ma domains −0.9%

48 B

brixly.comEnix 112.ma domains −11.1%

49 H

hetzner.deindependent 109.ma domains −4.4%

50 B

brandshelter.comTeam Internet 106.ma domains +6%

51 A

akamai.netindependent 105.ma domains +1%

52 D

dreamhost.comindependent 104.ma domains +0%

53 I

inmotionhosting.comInmotion 99.ma domains −6.6%

54 D

dnsip.comindependent 96.ma domains +57.4%

55 N

netsto.netindependent 95.ma domains +43.9%

56 D

dondominio.comindependent 88.ma domains +1.1%

57 I

iptwins.netindependent 86.ma domains −1.1%

58 N

newfold.comNewfold Digital 75.ma domains −8.5%

59 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 74.ma domains −1.3%

60 R

61 S

spaceship.netNamecheap 70.ma domains +9.4%

62 S

safenames.comindependent 65.ma domains +0%

63 I

ifastnet.comindependent 63.ma domains +3.3%

64 I

inwx.chindependent 60.ma domains +0%

65 U

ultradns.netindependent 57.ma domains −6.6%

66 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 57.ma domains −1.7%

67 C

combell.euTeam Blue 56.ma domains +5.7%

68 T

trouble-free.netindependent 55.ma domains +5.8%

69 L

locaweb.com.brindependent 51.ma domains +0%

70 N

ns.deindependent 51.ma domains +4.1%

71 S

supremeservers.comindependent 49.ma domains +2.1%

72 D

dnspod.netindependent 49.ma domains +2.1%

73 C

cprapid.comindependent 48.ma domains −9.4%

74 R

renault.frindependent 48.ma domains +0%

75 G

greengeeks.netindependent 47.ma domains −11.3%

76 A

alibaba.comindependent 46.ma domains −2.1%

77 R

resellerclub.comNewfold Digital 46.ma domains −6.1%

78 Q

quic.cloudindependent 44.ma domains −6.4%

79 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 42.ma domains +7.7%

80 P

Ports.netindependent 42.ma domains −4.5%

81 I

icp100.netindependent 42.ma domains +10.5%

82 S

server.comindependent 40.ma domains +0%

83 I

indomco.comindependent 39.ma domains −2.5%

84 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 38.ma domains +0%

85 N

nadns1.frindependent 38.ma domains +40.7%

86 W

WordPress.comindependent 36.ma domains −5.3%

87 N

namespace.geindependent 36.ma domains −2.7%

88 V

vimexx.nlTeam Blue 36.ma domains +0%

89 H

hostnet.nlGroup One 33.ma domains −5.7%

90 H

http.netNamespace 33.ma domains −19.5%

91 L

lexsynergy.netindependent 33.ma domains −2.9%

92 O

obambu.comindependent 32.ma domains +0%

93 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 29.ma domains −3.3%

94 S

SmarterASP.netindependent 26.ma domains −3.7%

95 R

regery.netindependent 24.ma domains −4%

96 N

nuxit.comindependent 24.ma domains +0%

97 H

hostpoint.chindependent 24.ma domains −11.1%

98 A

Atom.comindependent 23.ma domains −8%

99 B

bnpparibas.comindependent 23.ma domains +0%

100 C

cetsi.frindependent 23.ma domains −4.2%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

84K

.ma now

-1K

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1dnsip.com+57.4%

2netsto.net+43.9%

3nadns1.fr+40.7%

4icp100.net+10.5%

Losing ground

1http.net−19.5%

2nameshield.net−13.2%

3netim.net−11.8%

4greengeeks.net−11.3%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.