.ma - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇲🇦

.ma

ccTLD zone

87K

Zone size

570

Operators

Moderate

Concentration

Top operators in .ma by domains in the zone

1 H

heberjahiz.comindependent 13K.ma domains +3%

2 C

cloudflare.comindependent 12K.ma domains +5.8%

3 H

hostinger.comindependent 8K.ma domains +5%

4 M

menara.maindependent 8K.ma domains +0.6%

5 N

nindohost.netindependent 7K.ma domains +6.2%

6 C

capconnect.comindependent 6K.ma domains +7%

7 D

DNS.comindependent 5K.ma domains +2%

8 A

adk-media.comindependent 3K.ma domains +1.7%

9 Y

youcan.shopindependent 2K.ma domains +5.5%

10 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 2K.ma domains +2.7%

11 2

20i.comindependent 2K.ma domains +1.4%

12 H

heberfacile.netindependent 2K.ma domains +2.2%

13 O

o2switch.netYour Online 1K.ma domains +4.1%

14 W

wanacorp.comindependent 1K.ma domains +0.7%

15 C

cscglobal.comindependent 795.ma domains +0.5%

16 V

vercel.comindependent 765.ma domains +12.3%

17 O

ovh.comindependent 741.ma domains +1.5%

18 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 592.ma domains +0.2%

19 P

planethoster.netindependent 569.ma domains +3.5%

20 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 506.ma domains +0.6%

21 N

nsone.netindependent 496.ma domains +7.6%

22 G

gandi.netYour Online 478.ma domains +1.3%

23 A

Amazonindependent 431.ma domains +0.9%

24 W

wix.comindependent 415.ma domains +0.2%

25 L

lwsdns.comindependent 377.ma domains +1.9%

26 I

infomaniak.chindependent 341.ma domains +1.2%

27 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 289.ma domains +3.6%

28 W

webcentral.com.auWorld Host Group 279.ma domains +5.3%

29 C

contabo.netindependent 279.ma domains +0.4%

30 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 262.ma domains −0.8%

31 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 261.ma domains +2%

32 N

networksolutions.comNewfold Digital 261.ma domains +5.7%

33 N

netim.netindependent 256.ma domains +1.2%

34 N

nameshield.netindependent 229.ma domains −0.4%

35 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 221.ma domains +1.8%

36 D

digitalocean.comindependent 219.ma domains +6.3%

37 A

azure-dns.comindependent 208.ma domains +2%

38 M

microsoft.comindependent 207.ma domains +4%

39 E

eurodns.comNamespace 202.ma domains +1%

40 T

thundercloud.ukindependent 183.ma domains +1.7%

41 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 169.ma domains +0%

42 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 152.ma domains +0%

43 S

safebrands.frindependent 142.ma domains +1.4%

44 S

siteground.netindependent 141.ma domains +0.7%

45 C

cloud.google.comindependent 140.ma domains +1.4%

46 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 139.ma domains +2.2%

47 N

nordnet.comindependent 115.ma domains +0.9%

48 B

brixly.comEnix 114.ma domains +1.8%

49 A

akamai.netindependent 109.ma domains +3.8%

50 H

hetzner.deindependent 109.ma domains +0%

51 D

dreamhost.comindependent 105.ma domains +1%

52 I

inmotionhosting.comInmotion 104.ma domains +5.1%

53 B

brandshelter.comTeam Internet 100.ma domains −5.7%

54 N

netsto.netindependent 90.ma domains −5.3%

55 D

dondominio.comindependent 89.ma domains +1.1%

56 I

iptwins.netindependent 88.ma domains +2.3%

57 D

dnsip.comindependent 80.ma domains −16.7%

58 N

newfold.comNewfold Digital 77.ma domains +2.7%

59 S

spaceship.netNamecheap 76.ma domains +8.6%

60 R

61 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 73.ma domains −1.4%

62 S

safenames.comindependent 65.ma domains +0%

63 I

inwx.chindependent 61.ma domains +1.7%

64 U

ultradns.netindependent 59.ma domains +3.5%

65 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 58.ma domains +1.8%

66 I

ifastnet.comindependent 57.ma domains −9.5%

67 T

trouble-free.netindependent 57.ma domains +3.6%

68 C

combell.euTeam Blue 55.ma domains −1.8%

69 N

ns.deindependent 54.ma domains +5.9%

70 L

locaweb.com.brindependent 51.ma domains +0%

71 C

cprapid.comindependent 49.ma domains +2.1%

72 S

supremeservers.comindependent 49.ma domains +0%

73 D

dnspod.netindependent 49.ma domains +0%

74 G

greengeeks.netindependent 48.ma domains +2.1%

75 R

renault.frindependent 48.ma domains +0%

76 R

resellerclub.comNewfold Digital 46.ma domains +0%

77 A

alibaba.comindependent 45.ma domains −2.2%

78 P

Ports.netindependent 44.ma domains +4.8%

79 Q

quic.cloudindependent 43.ma domains −2.3%

80 I

icp100.netindependent 43.ma domains +2.4%

81 S

server.comindependent 42.ma domains +5%

82 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 41.ma domains −2.4%

83 I

indomco.comindependent 40.ma domains +2.6%

84 W

WordPress.comindependent 39.ma domains +8.3%

85 N

namespace.geindependent 38.ma domains +5.6%

86 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 37.ma domains −2.6%

87 N

nadns1.frindependent 37.ma domains −2.6%

88 V

vimexx.nlTeam Blue 36.ma domains +0%

89 L

lexsynergy.netindependent 34.ma domains +3%

90 O

obambu.comindependent 34.ma domains +6.3%

91 H

hostnet.nlGroup One 33.ma domains +0%

92 H

http.netNamespace 33.ma domains +0%

93 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 27.ma domains −6.9%

94 S

SmarterASP.netindependent 26.ma domains +0%

95 R

regery.netindependent 24.ma domains +0%

96 N

nuxit.comindependent 24.ma domains +0%

97 A

Atom.comindependent 23.ma domains +0%

98 D

dns.nexusindependent 23.ma domains +4.5%

99 B

bnpparibas.comindependent 23.ma domains +0%

100 H

hostpoint.chindependent 23.ma domains −4.2%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

87K

.ma now

+3K

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1vercel.com+12.3%

2spaceship.net+8.6%

3WordPress.com+8.3%

4nsone.net+7.6%

Losing ground

1dnsip.com−16.7%

2ifastnet.com−9.5%

3Name.com−6.9%

4brandshelter.com−5.7%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.