.no - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇳🇴

.no

ccTLD zone · operated by Norid

759K

Zone size

897

Operators

Concentrated

Concentration

Top operators in .no by domains in the zone

1 D

domeneshop.noMiss Group 324K.no domains −0.6%

2 O

One.comGroup One 130K.no domains −0.4%

3 P

proisp.noGroup One 38K.no domains −0.3%

4 C

cloudflare.comindependent 35K.no domains +4.4%

5 D

domene.noMiss Group 33K.no domains +1%

6 D

Datacenter.noindependent 32K.no domains +1.3%

7 W

wix.comindependent 13K.no domains −1.4%

8 L

loopia.seTeam Blue 10K.no domains −0.4%

9 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 7K.no domains +0.8%

10 C

cscglobal.comindependent 5K.no domains −0.4%

11 T

telenor.netindependent 5K.no domains +0%

12 A

Amazonindependent 5K.no domains +1%

13 M

missgroup.comMiss Group 5K.no domains −1.5%

14 S

sircon.netindependent 5K.no domains +0%

15 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 5K.no domains −1%

16 A

azure-dns.comindependent 4K.no domains +1.7%

17 N

netclient.noindependent 4K.no domains +0%

18 F

Fruits.coindependent 4K.no domains −0.8%

19 I

itpays.noindependent 4K.no domains +0.8%

20 P

Ports.netindependent 3K.no domains +0.7%

21 S

stw.noindependent 3K.no domains −0.1%

22 D

dipcon.comindependent 3K.no domains +0%

23 C

cpanel.guruindependent 3K.no domains −1.2%

24 R

25 H

hostinger.comindependent 3K.no domains −3%

26 S

Simply.comTeam Blue 2K.no domains +2.1%

27 W

WordPress.comindependent 2K.no domains −1.4%

28 E

eurodns.comNamespace 2K.no domains +1%

29 N

nordhost.noindependent 2K.no domains +3.9%

30 M

microsoft.comindependent 2K.no domains −0.4%

31 N

nordic.hostingindependent 2K.no domains +0.1%

32 H

he.netindependent 2K.no domains +0.8%

33 N

nsone.netindependent 2K.no domains +5.4%

34 A

as2116.netindependent 2K.no domains −0.1%

35 H

halden.orgindependent 2K.no domains −0.1%

36 D

DNS.comindependent 2K.no domains +1.3%

37 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 2K.no domains −0.1%

38 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 1K.no domains +2.2%

39 C

cloud.google.comindependent 1K.no domains +0.9%

40 S

subsys.noindependent 1K.no domains −0.2%

41 V

vercel.comindependent 1K.no domains +6.4%

42 D

domenia.noindependent 1K.no domains −0.5%

43 H

host1.noindependent 1K.no domains −0.6%

44 N

nameisp.comMiss Group 1K.no domains −0.8%

45 O

online4u.noindependent 1K.no domains +0%

46 J

jostedal.noindependent 1K.no domains +0%

47 H

hjelseth.comindependent 1K.no domains +0.9%

48 N

netbox.noindependent 1K.no domains −1%

49 A

adata.noindependent 1K.no domains +0.3%

50 I

it.netindependent 954.no domains −3.7%

51 C

cloudns.netindependent 933.no domains +1.7%

52 U

upheads.noindependent 906.no domains +3%

53 S

startpunktet.comindependent 900.no domains −1.5%

54 D

digitalocean.comindependent 859.no domains −2.4%

55 B

brandshelter.comTeam Internet 848.no domains −0.4%

56 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 842.no domains +0%

57 S

siteground.netindependent 839.no domains −1.3%

58 A

antagonist.nlGroup One 805.no domains +3.7%

59 N

netim.netindependent 792.no domains +2.9%

60 L

luadns.comindependent 790.no domains −0.5%

61 G

gandi.netYour Online 773.no domains +0.7%

62 A

advania.noindependent 763.no domains −0.3%

63 K

kitdns.noindependent 762.no domains −0.4%

64 A

altidata.netindependent 740.no domains +0%

65 O

openprovider.nlindependent 714.no domains +4.1%

66 A

akamai.netindependent 694.no domains −0.7%

67 N

netpower.noindependent 666.no domains +0%

68 N

namesrs.comindependent 654.no domains −0.2%

69 T

tussa.noindependent 633.no domains −0.2%

70 N

nameshield.netindependent 617.no domains +0%

71 Z

zaccodigitaltrustlabs.comindependent 542.no domains −4.4%

72 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 528.no domains −2.2%

73 D

dandomain.dkTeam Blue 487.no domains +0.6%

74 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 480.no domains −1.8%

75 H

hetzner.deindependent 435.no domains +6.6%

76 D

dreamhost.comindependent 402.no domains −2.9%

77 N

namespace.geindependent 395.no domains +45.8%

78 S

safenames.comindependent 350.no domains +1.4%

79 U

ultradns.netindependent 337.no domains +1.2%

80 I

internetx.comUnited Internet 332.no domains −0.9%

81 C

curanet.dkTeam Blue 307.no domains −1.3%

82 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 296.no domains −8.1%

83 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 293.no domains +5%

84 I

ilkari.techindependent 284.no domains +0.7%

85 N

networksolutions.comNewfold Digital 278.no domains −0.4%

86 D

domaininfo.comindependent 266.no domains +0%

87 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 265.no domains −1.9%

88 W

web-solutions.dkindependent 259.no domains +0.4%

89 S

serveriai.ltindependent 259.no domains +0.8%

90 O

oderland.comindependent 252.no domains −0.4%

91 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 252.no domains −0.4%

92 2

20i.comindependent 244.no domains +1.2%

93 N

namesystem.seindependent 240.no domains −4%

94 C

cargocollective.comindependent 235.no domains +0%

95 N

ns.deindependent 219.no domains +2.3%

96 K

key-systems.netTeam Internet 201.no domains −2.9%

97 W

webcentral.com.auWorld Host Group 195.no domains −2%

98 M

mono.netindependent 179.no domains +1.1%

99 O

oraclecloud.netindependent 178.no domains +0.6%

100 I

ilait.seMiss Group 178.no domains +0.6%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

759K

.no now

+6K

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1namespace.ge+45.8%

2hetzner.de+6.6%

3vercel.com+6.4%

4nsone.net+5.4%

Losing ground

1a2hosting.com−8.1%

2zaccodigitaltrustlabs.com−4.4%

3namesystem.se−4%

4it.net−3.7%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.