.no - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇳🇴

.no

ccTLD zone · operated by Norid

756K

Zone size

888

Operators

Concentrated

Concentration

Top operators in .no by domains in the zone

1 D

domeneshop.noMiss Group 319K.no domains −1.3%

2 O

One.comGroup One 129K.no domains −0.7%

3 C

cloudflare.comindependent 38K.no domains +7%

4 P

proisp.noGroup One 37K.no domains −0.3%

5 D

domene.noMiss Group 34K.no domains +1.4%

6 D

Datacenter.noindependent 32K.no domains +0.8%

7 W

wix.comindependent 13K.no domains −2.2%

8 L

loopia.seTeam Blue 9K.no domains −0.9%

9 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 7K.no domains −2.2%

10 C

cscglobal.comindependent 5K.no domains −0.5%

11 T

telenor.netindependent 5K.no domains −0.4%

12 A

Amazonindependent 5K.no domains −0.1%

13 S

sircon.netindependent 5K.no domains −0.1%

14 M

missgroup.comMiss Group 5K.no domains −1.5%

15 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 5K.no domains −0.8%

16 A

azure-dns.comindependent 4K.no domains +0.2%

17 N

netclient.noindependent 4K.no domains +0%

18 F

Fruits.coindependent 4K.no domains +1.3%

19 I

itpays.noindependent 4K.no domains −0.1%

20 P

Ports.netindependent 3K.no domains +0.6%

21 D

dipcon.comindependent 3K.no domains +1.4%

22 S

stw.noindependent 3K.no domains −0.3%

23 C

cpanel.guruindependent 3K.no domains −0.7%

24 R

25 H

hostinger.comindependent 3K.no domains −1.1%

26 S

Simply.comTeam Blue 2K.no domains +0%

27 N

nordhost.noindependent 2K.no domains +1.2%

28 W

WordPress.comindependent 2K.no domains −2.3%

29 E

eurodns.comNamespace 2K.no domains −0.5%

30 M

microsoft.comindependent 2K.no domains −0.6%

31 N

nordic.hostingindependent 2K.no domains +1%

32 N

nsone.netindependent 2K.no domains +2.7%

33 H

he.netindependent 2K.no domains −1.8%

34 A

as2116.netindependent 2K.no domains −0.2%

35 H

halden.orgindependent 2K.no domains −0.8%

36 D

DNS.comindependent 2K.no domains +0.3%

37 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 2K.no domains −0.7%

38 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 1K.no domains −3%

39 C

cloud.google.comindependent 1K.no domains −0.4%

40 V

vercel.comindependent 1K.no domains +4.5%

41 S

subsys.noindependent 1K.no domains +0.1%

42 D

domenia.noindependent 1K.no domains −0.3%

43 H

host1.noindependent 1K.no domains +0%

44 O

online4u.noindependent 1K.no domains +0.7%

45 N

nameisp.comMiss Group 1K.no domains −0.7%

46 J

jostedal.noindependent 1K.no domains −0.2%

47 H

hjelseth.comindependent 1K.no domains −1.1%

48 N

netbox.noindependent 1K.no domains −0.4%

49 A

adata.noindependent 1K.no domains −0.5%

50 C

cloudns.netindependent 974.no domains +4.4%

51 U

upheads.noindependent 908.no domains +0.2%

52 S

startpunktet.comindependent 891.no domains −1%

53 I

it.netindependent 874.no domains −8.4%

54 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 843.no domains +0.1%

55 D

digitalocean.comindependent 837.no domains −2.6%

56 S

siteground.netindependent 830.no domains −1.1%

57 B

brandshelter.comTeam Internet 810.no domains −4.5%

58 N

netim.netindependent 807.no domains +1.9%

59 G

gandi.netYour Online 771.no domains −0.3%

60 A

advania.noindependent 761.no domains −0.3%

61 A

antagonist.nlGroup One 751.no domains −6.7%

62 L

luadns.comindependent 750.no domains −5.1%

63 K

kitdns.noindependent 746.no domains −2.1%

64 A

altidata.netindependent 743.no domains +0.4%

65 O

openprovider.nlindependent 731.no domains +2.4%

66 A

akamai.netindependent 682.no domains −1.7%

67 N

netpower.noindependent 663.no domains −0.5%

68 N

namesrs.comindependent 644.no domains −1.5%

69 T

tussa.noindependent 634.no domains +0.2%

70 N

nameshield.netindependent 616.no domains −0.2%

71 Z

zaccodigitaltrustlabs.comindependent 542.no domains +0%

72 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 521.no domains −1.3%

73 D

dandomain.dkTeam Blue 482.no domains −1%

74 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 476.no domains −0.8%

75 H

hetzner.deindependent 444.no domains +2.1%

76 D

dreamhost.comindependent 399.no domains −0.7%

77 N

namespace.geindependent 394.no domains −0.3%

78 S

safenames.comindependent 349.no domains −0.3%

79 I

internetx.comUnited Internet 343.no domains +3.3%

80 U

ultradns.netindependent 334.no domains −0.9%

81 C

curanet.dkTeam Blue 292.no domains −4.9%

82 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 292.no domains −1.4%

83 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 275.no domains −6.1%

84 N

networksolutions.comNewfold Digital 274.no domains −1.4%

85 I

ilkari.techindependent 262.no domains −7.7%

86 D

domaininfo.comindependent 256.no domains −3.8%

87 W

web-solutions.dkindependent 255.no domains −1.5%

88 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 254.no domains −4.2%

89 2

20i.comindependent 254.no domains +4.1%

90 S

serveriai.ltindependent 253.no domains −2.3%

91 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 252.no domains +0%

92 O

oderland.comindependent 247.no domains −2%

93 N

namesystem.seindependent 238.no domains −0.8%

94 C

cargocollective.comindependent 233.no domains −0.9%

95 N

ns.deindependent 218.no domains −0.5%

96 K

key-systems.netTeam Internet 199.no domains −1%

97 W

webcentral.com.auWorld Host Group 193.no domains −1%

98 M

mono.netindependent 178.no domains −0.6%

99 O

oraclecloud.netindependent 177.no domains −0.6%

100 I

ilait.seMiss Group 175.no domains −1.7%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

756K

.no now

-3K

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1cloudflare.com+7%

2vercel.com+4.5%

3cloudns.net+4.4%

420i.com+4.1%

Losing ground

1it.net−8.4%

2ilkari.tech−7.7%

3antagonist.nl−6.7%

4united-domains.de−6.1%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.