.pw - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

.pw

TLD zone

73K

Zone size

595

Operators

Moderate

Concentration

Top operators in .pw by domains in the zone

1 C

cloudflare.comindependent 17K.pw domains −3.9%

2 U

unstoppabledomains.comindependent 10K.pw domains +2.9%

3 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 5K.pw domains +13.1%

4 A

Atom.comindependent 5K.pw domains +44.4%

5 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 5K.pw domains −13%

6 A

alibaba.comindependent 4K.pw domains +7.8%

7 R

Reg.ruRuniti 2K.pw domains +0.7%

8 D

dynadot.comindependent 2K.pw domains −2.7%

9 W

west.cnindependent 2K.pw domains −12.9%

10 B

beget.comindependent 2K.pw domains +1.6%

11 E

ename.netindependent 1K.pw domains −11.1%

12 G

Gname.comindependent 1K.pw domains −7.3%

13 C

cloud.google.comindependent 1K.pw domains −6.8%

14 X

xundns.comindependent 1K.pw domains −3.5%

15 D

dnsip.comindependent 903.pw domains −11.4%

16 P

parity.domainsindependent 759.pw domains

17 S

spaceship.netNamecheap 753.pw domains +9.8%

18 A

Above.comindependent 710.pw domains +23.9%

19 D

dns-redirect.comindependent 667.pw domains +1.1%

20 D

DNS.comindependent 570.pw domains −4.7%

21 H

hostinger.comindependent 498.pw domains −6.4%

22 P

porkbun.comindependent 498.pw domains −4.2%

23 P

parklogic.comindependent 485.pw domains +31.4%

24 G

gandi.netYour Online 476.pw domains −1.7%

25 A

Amazonindependent 459.pw domains +0.4%

26 G

gmo.jpGmo Internet 434.pw domains −1.1%

27 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 389.pw domains −2.3%

28 D

dnspod.netindependent 371.pw domains +1.1%

29 N

namesilo.comindependent 336.pw domains −5.1%

30 N

now.cnindependent 298.pw domains +39.9%

31 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 247.pw domains −7.1%

32 3

363.hkindependent 229.pw domains +2.7%

33 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 217.pw domains −5.7%

34 X

xserver.jpNetowl 181.pw domains +0.6%

35 D

digitalocean.comindependent 176.pw domains −5.4%

36 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 170.pw domains +0%

37 X

xinnet.comindependent 169.pw domains −1.7%

38 M

mijndomein.nlindependent 153.pw domains −2.5%

39 O

ovh.comindependent 139.pw domains +1.5%

40 R

rollerads.comindependent 136.pw domains −37%

41 C

cscglobal.comindependent 129.pw domains +0.8%

42 C

cloudns.netindependent 128.pw domains −6.6%

43 E

eranet.comindependent 105.pw domains −6.3%

44 J

Joker.comindependent 96.pw domains −1%

45 O

onamae.comGmo Internet 95.pw domains −14.4%

46 D

dns-expired.comindependent 92.pw domains +4.5%

47 N

nsone.netindependent 92.pw domains −9.8%

48 C

chinasource.netindependent 90.pw domains +0%

49 R

resellerclub.comNewfold Digital 89.pw domains −2.2%

50 E

epik.comindependent 88.pw domains −1.1%

51 2

24hyyls.comindependent 87.pw domains −2.2%

52 Y

yandex.netindependent 84.pw domains −4.5%

53 I

inwx.chindependent 75.pw domains +0%

54 H

he.netindependent 71.pw domains −2.7%

55 V

vercel.comindependent 69.pw domains −9.2%

56 A

akamai.netindependent 68.pw domains +1.5%

57 W

webnic.ccindependent 60.pw domains +11.1%

58 H

hetzner.deindependent 60.pw domains +3.4%

59 N

networksolutions.comNewfold Digital 60.pw domains −3.2%

60 F

fastmail.comindependent 55.pw domains +0%

61 T

timeweb.comindependent 51.pw domains +6.3%

62 D

domainesia.comindependent 49.pw domains +6.5%

63 U

ultradns.netindependent 47.pw domains +14.6%

64 E

ezdnscenter.comindependent 46.pw domains −9.8%

65 D

domaindiscount24.comTeam Internet 46.pw domains +0%

66 G

giantpanda.comindependent 46.pw domains −8%

67 D

dreamhost.comindependent 44.pw domains +0%

68 A

azure-dns.comindependent 44.pw domains +0%

69 N

njalla.doindependent 44.pw domains +2.3%

70 A

azure.microsoft.comindependent 40.pw domains +0%

71 T

Tilda.ruindependent 39.pw domains −4.9%

72 C

constellix.comindependent 38.pw domains −2.6%

73 S

siteground.netindependent 37.pw domains −2.6%

74 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 37.pw domains +0%

75 B

brandshelter.comTeam Internet 35.pw domains +0%

76 C

crazydomains.comNewfold Digital 34.pw domains +0%

77 P

progreso.plindependent 34.pw domains +0%

78 S

safenames.comindependent 32.pw domains +0%

79 D

domainnamens.comindependent 32.pw domains +128.6%

80 I

icedns.isindependent 31.pw domains −3.1%

81 I

ibspark.comindependent 31.pw domains +63.2%

82 A

afraid.orgindependent 30.pw domains −3.2%

83 B

bunny.netindependent 30.pw domains +3.4%

84 A

apple.comindependent 30.pw domains +0%

85 N

netsto.netindependent 29.pw domains −14.7%

86 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 29.pw domains −12.1%

87 D

dnsimple.comindependent 28.pw domains −3.4%

88 Z

zomro.ruindependent 28.pw domains +12%

89 K

kirklanddc.comindependent 28.pw domains −24.3%

90 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 27.pw domains +0%

91 S

selectel.ruindependent 27.pw domains +0%

92 D

desec.ioindependent 26.pw domains +13%

93 W

Whois.comindependent 26.pw domains −3.7%

94 D

dnsxdp.comindependent 26.pw domains +73.3%

95 L

link-host.netindependent 26.pw domains −3.7%

96 A

arvancdn.irindependent 26.pw domains −7.1%

97 B

bigwww.comindependent 25.pw domains +0%

98 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 24.pw domains +0%

99 V

vultr.comindependent 24.pw domains +0%

100 N

nic.ruRuniti 24.pw domains +4.3%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

73K

.pw now

+4K

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1domainnamens.com+128.6%

2dnsxdp.com+73.3%

3ibspark.com+63.2%

4Atom.com+44.4%

Losing ground

1rollerads.com−37%

2kirklanddc.com−24.3%

3netsto.net−14.7%

4onamae.com−14.4%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.