.run - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

.run

TLD zone

133K

Zone size

517

Operators

Concentrated

Concentration

Top operators in .run by domains in the zone

1 A

alibaba.comindependent 55K.run domains +4.2%

2 D

dnsip.comindependent 25K.run domains +16.7%

3 C

cloudflare.comindependent 22K.run domains +7%

4 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 6K.run domains +2.7%

5 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 4K.run domains +3.9%

6 A

Above.comindependent 3K.run domains +58.1%

7 C

cloud.google.comindependent 2K.run domains +6%

8 S

spaceship.netNamecheap 1K.run domains +13.5%

9 P

porkbun.comindependent 1K.run domains +6%

10 A

Amazonindependent 1K.run domains +7.6%

11 D

dnspod.netindependent 941.run domains +5.3%

12 V

vercel.comindependent 832.run domains +5.4%

13 O

ovh.comindependent 683.run domains +1.6%

14 R

regway.comindependent 683.run domains +1.5%

15 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 640.run domains +11.9%

16 D

dynadot.comindependent 557.run domains −31.8%

17 H

hostinger.comindependent 545.run domains −0.2%

18 D

dns-redirect.comindependent 523.run domains +23.3%

19 N

namesilo.comindependent 439.run domains −6%

20 D

DNS.comindependent 365.run domains +21.3%

21 A

Atom.comindependent 349.run domains −6.4%

22 P

parklogic.comindependent 305.run domains +29.8%

23 N

nsone.netindependent 303.run domains +0%

24 W

west.cnindependent 273.run domains +5.8%

25 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 265.run domains +3.1%

26 G

Gname.comindependent 247.run domains +6%

27 D

digitalocean.comindependent 189.run domains +5.6%

28 A

azure.microsoft.comindependent 167.run domains +0%

29 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 155.run domains +24%

30 W

WordPress.comindependent 154.run domains +2%

31 H

hover.comTucows 153.run domains +3.4%

32 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 150.run domains +4.2%

33 G

gandi.netYour Online 128.run domains +3.2%

34 G

gabia.co.krindependent 125.run domains +5%

35 D

dns-expired.comindependent 120.run domains +39.5%

36 X

xundns.comindependent 111.run domains −8.3%

37 S

strato.deUnited Internet 110.run domains +1.9%

38 D

dns.wsindependent 109.run domains +62.7%

39 R

Reg.ruRuniti 97.run domains +3.2%

40 H

hetzner.deindependent 94.run domains +9.3%

41 S

siteground.netindependent 94.run domains +1.1%

42 R

rollerads.comindependent 89.run domains −11.9%

43 W

wix.comindependent 85.run domains +0%

44 O

onamae.comGmo Internet 82.run domains +9.3%

45 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 82.run domains +0%

46 H

Hosting.krindependent 80.run domains +2.6%

47 S

Sav.comindependent 76.run domains +7%

48 G

gmo.jpGmo Internet 73.run domains +7.4%

49 D

dreamhost.comindependent 72.run domains +2.9%

50 D

dnsimple.comindependent 67.run domains +415.4%

51 T

tucows.comTucows 63.run domains +43.2%

52 I

infomaniak.chindependent 63.run domains +8.6%

53 A

azure-dns.comindependent 62.run domains +6.9%

54 D

domeneshop.noMiss Group 60.run domains +1.7%

55 O

One.comGroup One 58.run domains +1.8%

56 D

dnsns5.comindependent 58.run domains +9.4%

57 N

networksolutions.comNewfold Digital 57.run domains +1.8%

58 N

nic.ruRuniti 52.run domains +4%

59 C

cloudns.netindependent 51.run domains +45.7%

60 A

akamai.netindependent 47.run domains +2.2%

61 X

xinnet.comindependent 44.run domains +4.8%

62 N

njalla.doindependent 41.run domains +20.6%

63 E

edgedns.coindependent 39.run domains +34.5%

64 I

inwx.chindependent 39.run domains +8.3%

65 C

cscglobal.comindependent 37.run domains +0%

66 E

eurodns.comNamespace 37.run domains +0%

67 B

beget.comindependent 36.run domains −2.7%

68 A

aruba.itAruba Group 34.run domains +0%

69 H

helloserver.winindependent 33.run domains −17.5%

70 R

resellerclub.comNewfold Digital 33.run domains +0%

71 X

xserver.jpNetowl 31.run domains +3.3%

72 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 31.run domains +6.9%

73 O

o2switch.netYour Online 30.run domains +0%

74 A

All-Inkl.comindependent 30.run domains −3.2%

75 T

transip.nlTeam Blue 27.run domains +8%

76 B

bunny.netindependent 27.run domains +12.5%

77 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 27.run domains +3.8%

78 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 27.run domains +3.8%

79 E

easyspace.comIomart 24.run domains +0%

80 F

fastmail.comindependent 24.run domains +0%

81 T

timeweb.comindependent 22.run domains +0%

82 G

globaldomaingroup.comindependent 22.run domains +22.2%

83 3

363.hkindependent 21.run domains +0%

84 N

newfold.comNewfold Digital 20.run domains +0%

85 G

giantpanda.comindependent 20.run domains +0%

86 R

87 H

he.netindependent 19.run domains +5.6%

88 S

synergywholesale.com.auVentraip 18.run domains +0%

89 P

parklogictestns1.comindependent 17.run domains +54.5%

90 F

fasthosts.co.ukUnited Internet 17.run domains +0%

91 E

eranet.comindependent 16.run domains +0%

92 U

ultradns.netindependent 16.run domains +23.1%

93 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 16.run domains +0%

94 N

ns.deindependent 15.run domains −34.8%

95 C

cdmon.netindependent 15.run domains +25%

96 D

dnsv2.comindependent 15.run domains +0%

97 J

js55cne.comindependent 15.run domains +0%

98 H

hostpoint.chindependent 14.run domains +0%

99 U

unstoppabledomains.comindependent 14.run domains −6.7%

100 C

cnolnic.comindependent 14.run domains +7.7%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

133K

.run now

+9K

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1dnsimple.com+415.4%

2dns.ws+62.7%

3Above.com+58.1%

4parklogictestns1.com+54.5%

Losing ground

1ns.de−34.8%

2dynadot.com−31.8%

3helloserver.win−17.5%

4rollerads.com−11.9%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.