.to - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇹🇴

.to

ccTLD zone

63K

Zone size

685

Operators

Highly concentrated

Concentration

Top operators in .to by domains in the zone

1 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 30K.to domains −0.2%

2 C

cloudflare.comindependent 11K.to domains +2.4%

3 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 10K.to domains −2.5%

4 S

spaceship.netNamecheap 2K.to domains +33.9%

5 A

Amazon Route 53independent 1K.to domains −1.1%

6 A

Above.comindependent 772.to domains +6.8%

7 P

parklogic.comindependent 481.to domains −3.8%

8 X

xserver.jpNetowl 337.to domains +0.3%

9 V

vercel.comindependent 301.to domains +10.7%

10 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 241.to domains −1.6%

11 D

DNS.comindependent 240.to domains −2.8%

12 D

digitalocean.comindependent 231.to domains −2.9%

13 N

nsone.netindependent 206.to domains +7.9%

14 P

porkbun.comindependent 201.to domains +13.6%

15 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 164.to domains −3%

16 A

Atom.comindependent 157.to domains −1.3%

17 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 148.to domains +2.1%

18 H

hostinger.comindependent 144.to domains −4%

19 N

newfold.comNewfold Digital 144.to domains −11.7%

20 G

gmo.jpGmo Internet 144.to domains −1.4%

21 D

dreamhost.comindependent 136.to domains −2.2%

22 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 130.to domains −6.5%

23 W

websupport.skTeam Blue 122.to domains −1.6%

24 C

cscglobal.comindependent 120.to domains −1.6%

25 T

tucows.comTucows 118.to domains +18%

26 C

cloudns.netindependent 117.to domains −1.7%

27 C

cloud.google.comindependent 116.to domains −0.9%

28 D

dynadot.comindependent 115.to domains +26.4%

29 S

siteground.netindependent 105.to domains +1.9%

30 A

azure-dns.comindependent 103.to domains +0%

31 E

easydns.orgindependent 94.to domains +0%

32 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 92.to domains −3.2%

33 A

akamai.netindependent 85.to domains −3.4%

34 Z

zoneedit.comindependent 75.to domains +1.4%

35 G

giantpanda.comindependent 73.to domains +102.8%

36 H

hetzner.deindependent 65.to domains −8.5%

37 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 64.to domains −3%

38 D

dnspod.netindependent 61.to domains +5.2%

39 N

namepros-dns.comindependent 60.to domains +0%

40 I

inwx.chindependent 53.to domains +1.9%

41 H

he.netindependent 52.to domains +8.3%

42 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 52.to domains +30%

43 G

gandi.netYour Online 52.to domains +4%

44 R

45 I

internetx.comUnited Internet 49.to domains +0%

46 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 49.to domains −3.9%

47 I

iwantmyname.netTeam Internet 48.to domains −18.6%

48 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 48.to domains −5.9%

49 W

wix.comindependent 46.to domains −9.8%

50 H

home.plUnited Internet 43.to domains −2.3%

51 B

bunny.netindependent 42.to domains +7.7%

52 U

ultradns.netindependent 42.to domains +0%

53 N

netim.netindependent 41.to domains −2.4%

54 F

fastmail.comindependent 40.to domains +2.6%

55 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 40.to domains −4.8%

56 S

safenames.comindependent 39.to domains +2.6%

57 F

forpsi.czAruba Group 38.to domains −5%

58 K

kirklanddc.comindependent 37.to domains −2.6%

59 N

netcup.comindependent 37.to domains +0%

60 A

afraid.orgindependent 36.to domains +5.9%

61 W

webglobe.skGroup One 34.to domains +0%

62 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 34.to domains +0%

63 G

Gname.comindependent 34.to domains +54.5%

64 V

variomedia.deindependent 32.to domains +0%

65 E

eurodns.comNamespace 32.to domains +0%

66 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 32.to domains −3%

67 A

All-Inkl.comindependent 32.to domains +10.3%

68 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 31.to domains +0%

69 C

cyberfolks.plCyberfolks 31.to domains +3.3%

70 D

dnsimple.comindependent 30.to domains −6.3%

71 H

hostpoint.chindependent 29.to domains −3.3%

72 S

strato.deUnited Internet 29.to domains −6.5%

73 N

nazwa.plNetart 29.to domains +3.6%

74 N

ns.deindependent 29.to domains +20.8%

75 O

onamae.comGmo Internet 28.to domains −3.4%

76 A

ad.jpindependent 27.to domains +0%

77 N

njalla.doindependent 26.to domains −7.1%

78 H

helloserver.winindependent 25.to domains −3.8%

79 C

checkdomain.deGroup One 25.to domains −19.4%

80 H

hostnet.nlGroup One 24.to domains +0%

81 M

microsoft.comindependent 24.to domains +0%

82 L

loopia.seTeam Blue 24.to domains +4.3%

83 1

1984.isindependent 24.to domains −4%

84 N

nttpc.jpindependent 23.to domains +0%

85 T

tinyurl.comindependent 23.to domains +0%

86 E

extrainfra.comindependent 22.to domains +0%

87 I

inetd.co.jpindependent 21.to domains +0%

88 D

dnsitalia.netindependent 21.to domains +10.5%

89 E

eftydns.comindependent 21.to domains −4.5%

90 O

ovh.comindependent 20.to domains −57.4%

91 P

pair.comYour Online 20.to domains +0%

92 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 20.to domains −4.8%

93 D

dyn.comindependent 19.to domains +0%

94 S

server.comindependent 19.to domains −9.5%

95 R

rackspace.comindependent 19.to domains +0%

96 N

names.co.ukTeam Blue 18.to domains +0%

97 S

Sav.comindependent 17.to domains −5.6%

98 G

GigaServer.czindependent 17.to domains +0%

99 G

gransy.comindependent 17.to domains +6.3%

100 D

domeny.tvindependent 17.to domains +0%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

63K

.to now

+426

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1giantpanda.com+102.8%

2Gname.com+54.5%

3spaceship.net+33.9%

4Name.com+30%

Losing ground

1ovh.com−57.4%

2checkdomain.de−19.4%

3iwantmyname.net−18.6%

4newfold.com−11.7%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.