.to - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇹🇴

.to

ccTLD zone

65K

Zone size

687

Operators

Concentrated

Concentration

Top operators in .to by domains in the zone

1 P

parity.domainsindependent 19K.to domains

2 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 13K.to domains −57.2%

3 C

cloudflare.comindependent 12K.to domains +3.7%

4 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 9K.to domains −5.3%

5 A

Amazonindependent 1K.to domains +0.4%

6 S

spaceship.netNamecheap 1K.to domains −31.6%

7 A

Above.comindependent 533.to domains −30.6%

8 X

xserver.jpNetowl 336.to domains −0.9%

9 V

vercel.comindependent 333.to domains +2.5%

10 P

parklogic.comindependent 325.to domains −36%

11 D

DNS.comindependent 251.to domains −4.2%

12 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 232.to domains −2.5%

13 P

porkbun.comindependent 227.to domains +4.6%

14 D

digitalocean.comindependent 223.to domains −1.3%

15 D

dynadot.comindependent 216.to domains +13.1%

16 N

nsone.netindependent 208.to domains −1.4%

17 G

giantpanda.comindependent 182.to domains +304.4%

18 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 163.to domains +0%

19 A

Atom.comindependent 162.to domains +3.2%

20 H

hostinger.comindependent 151.to domains +2.7%

21 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 148.to domains +0.7%

22 G

gmo.jpGmo Internet 144.to domains −0.7%

23 N

newfold.comNewfold Digital 141.to domains −7.8%

24 D

dreamhost.comindependent 136.to domains −0.7%

25 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 133.to domains +0.8%

26 C

cloud.google.comindependent 127.to domains +4.1%

27 W

websupport.skTeam Blue 124.to domains −1.6%

28 C

cscglobal.comindependent 120.to domains +0%

29 T

tucows.comTucows 119.to domains +10.2%

30 C

cloudns.netindependent 119.to domains +1.7%

31 S

siteground.netindependent 109.to domains +2.8%

32 A

azure-dns.comindependent 107.to domains +2.9%

33 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 99.to domains +70.7%

34 E

easydns.orgindependent 95.to domains −2.1%

35 A

akamai.netindependent 91.to domains +1.1%

36 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 84.to domains −6.7%

37 H

hetzner.deindependent 75.to domains +15.4%

38 Z

zoneedit.comindependent 72.to domains +0%

39 D

dnspod.netindependent 69.to domains −8%

40 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 64.to domains +0%

41 R

rollerads.comindependent 61.to domains +454.5%

42 N

namepros-dns.comindependent 59.to domains +1.7%

43 G

Gname.comindependent 57.to domains +1.8%

44 I

inwx.chindependent 55.to domains +1.9%

45 A

alibaba.comindependent 53.to domains +103.8%

46 H

he.netindependent 52.to domains −3.7%

47 B

bunny.netindependent 51.to domains +0%

48 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 50.to domains +4.2%

49 G

gandi.netYour Online 49.to domains −3.9%

50 R

51 I

internetx.comUnited Internet 49.to domains +0%

52 W

wix.comindependent 47.to domains +0%

53 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 46.to domains −6.1%

54 U

ultradns.netindependent 42.to domains −4.5%

55 H

home.plUnited Internet 42.to domains −2.3%

56 N

netim.netindependent 41.to domains +0%

57 S

safenames.comindependent 39.to domains +0%

58 F

forpsi.czAruba Group 39.to domains +0%

59 F

fastmail.comindependent 39.to domains −2.5%

60 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 37.to domains −5.1%

61 N

netcup.comindependent 37.to domains +0%

62 A

afraid.orgindependent 36.to domains +2.9%

63 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 35.to domains +0%

64 W

webglobe.skGroup One 34.to domains +3%

65 A

All-Inkl.comindependent 33.to domains +3.1%

66 E

eurodns.comNamespace 33.to domains +3.1%

67 D

dnsimple.comindependent 32.to domains +3.2%

68 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 32.to domains +0%

69 K

kirklanddc.comindependent 31.to domains +3.3%

70 V

variomedia.deindependent 31.to domains −3.1%

71 C

cyberfolks.plCyberfolks 31.to domains +0%

72 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 30.to domains −3.2%

73 H

hostpoint.chindependent 30.to domains +3.4%

74 S

strato.deUnited Internet 29.to domains +0%

75 N

njalla.doindependent 29.to domains +0%

76 N

nazwa.plNetart 28.to domains −3.4%

77 O

onamae.comGmo Internet 28.to domains −3.4%

78 X

xundns.comindependent 27.to domains +3.8%

79 A

ad.jpindependent 26.to domains +0%

80 T

tinyurl.comindependent 26.to domains +4%

81 C

checkdomain.deGroup One 25.to domains +0%

82 H

helloserver.winindependent 25.to domains +0%

83 H

hostnet.nlGroup One 24.to domains +0%

84 N

nttpc.jpindependent 23.to domains +0%

85 N

ns.deindependent 23.to domains −30.3%

86 L

loopia.seTeam Blue 23.to domains +0%

87 M

microsoft.comindependent 23.to domains +0%

88 S

server.comindependent 22.to domains +22.2%

89 E

extrainfra.comindependent 22.to domains +0%

90 N

namesilo.comindependent 22.to domains +10%

91 O

ovh.comindependent 21.to domains +0%

92 1

1984.isindependent 21.to domains −8.7%

93 I

inetd.co.jpindependent 21.to domains +0%

94 E

eftydns.comindependent 20.to domains −4.8%

95 D

dnsitalia.netindependent 20.to domains −4.8%

96 W

webcentral.com.auWorld Host Group 19.to domains +0%

97 P

pair.comYour Online 19.to domains +0%

98 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 19.to domains +0%

99 N

names.co.ukTeam Blue 18.to domains +0%

100 D

dyn.comindependent 18.to domains −5.3%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

65K

.to now

+2K

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1rollerads.com+454.5%

2giantpanda.com+304.4%

3alibaba.com+103.8%

4Name.com+70.7%

Losing ground

1godaddy.com−57.2%

2parklogic.com−36%

3spaceship.net−31.6%

4Above.com−30.6%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.