.to - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇹🇴

.to

ccTLD zone

66K

Zone size

684

Operators

Concentrated

Concentration

Top operators in .to by domains in the zone

1 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 17K.to domains +36%

2 P

parity.domainsindependent 14K.to domains −22.1%

3 C

cloudflare.comindependent 12K.to domains +3.8%

4 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 9K.to domains −3.7%

5 A

Amazonindependent 1K.to domains −2.7%

6 S

spaceship.netNamecheap 1K.to domains +5.3%

7 A

Above.comindependent 648.to domains +21.6%

8 P

parklogic.comindependent 464.to domains +42.8%

9 V

vercel.comindependent 344.to domains +3.3%

10 X

xserver.jpNetowl 340.to domains +1.2%

11 D

DNS.comindependent 251.to domains +0%

12 D

dynadot.comindependent 245.to domains +13.4%

13 P

porkbun.comindependent 243.to domains +7%

14 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 227.to domains −2.2%

15 D

digitalocean.comindependent 224.to domains +0.4%

16 N

nsone.netindependent 200.to domains −3.8%

17 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 162.to domains −0.6%

18 H

hostinger.comindependent 155.to domains +2.6%

19 A

Atom.comindependent 149.to domains −8%

20 N

newfold.comNewfold Digital 147.to domains +4.3%

21 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 146.to domains −1.4%

22 G

gmo.jpGmo Internet 142.to domains −1.4%

23 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 136.to domains +2.3%

24 W

websupport.skTeam Blue 133.to domains +7.3%

25 D

dreamhost.comindependent 132.to domains −2.9%

26 C

cloud.google.comindependent 132.to domains +3.9%

27 C

cscglobal.comindependent 121.to domains +0.8%

28 C

cloudns.netindependent 115.to domains −3.4%

29 T

tucows.comTucows 112.to domains −5.9%

30 S

siteground.netindependent 110.to domains +0.9%

31 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 109.to domains +10.1%

32 A

azure-dns.comindependent 105.to domains −1.9%

33 E

easydns.orgindependent 96.to domains +1.1%

34 A

akamai.netindependent 91.to domains +0%

35 H

hetzner.deindependent 76.to domains +1.3%

36 D

dnspod.netindependent 76.to domains +10.1%

37 G

giantpanda.comindependent 74.to domains −59.3%

38 Z

zoneedit.comindependent 71.to domains −1.4%

39 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 70.to domains −16.7%

40 R

rollerads.comindependent 69.to domains +13.1%

41 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 64.to domains +0%

42 G

Gname.comindependent 63.to domains +10.5%

43 N

namepros-dns.comindependent 62.to domains +5.1%

44 I

inwx.chindependent 55.to domains +0%

45 A

alibaba.comindependent 54.to domains +1.9%

46 K

kirklanddc.comindependent 54.to domains +74.2%

47 H

he.netindependent 51.to domains −1.9%

48 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 50.to domains +0%

49 I

internetx.comUnited Internet 50.to domains +2%

50 B

bunny.netindependent 49.to domains −3.9%

51 R

52 G

gandi.netYour Online 48.to domains −2%

53 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 44.to domains −4.3%

54 W

wix.comindependent 44.to domains −6.4%

55 U

ultradns.netindependent 43.to domains +2.4%

56 H

home.plUnited Internet 42.to domains +0%

57 N

netim.netindependent 39.to domains −4.9%

58 F

forpsi.czAruba Group 39.to domains +0%

59 S

safenames.comindependent 39.to domains +0%

60 F

fastmail.comindependent 37.to domains −5.1%

61 A

afraid.orgindependent 37.to domains +2.8%

62 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 37.to domains +0%

63 N

netcup.comindependent 36.to domains −2.7%

64 A

All-Inkl.comindependent 34.to domains +3%

65 W

webglobe.skGroup One 34.to domains +0%

66 E

eurodns.comNamespace 34.to domains +3%

67 D

dnsimple.comindependent 32.to domains +0%

68 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 32.to domains +0%

69 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 32.to domains −8.6%

70 S

strato.deUnited Internet 30.to domains +3.4%

71 X

xundns.comindependent 30.to domains +11.1%

72 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 30.to domains +0%

73 O

onamae.comGmo Internet 29.to domains +3.6%

74 V

variomedia.deindependent 29.to domains −6.5%

75 C

cyberfolks.plCyberfolks 29.to domains −6.5%

76 N

nazwa.plNetart 28.to domains +0%

77 H

hostpoint.chindependent 27.to domains −10%

78 N

njalla.doindependent 26.to domains −10.3%

79 A

ad.jpindependent 26.to domains +0%

80 N

namesilo.comindependent 26.to domains +18.2%

81 C

checkdomain.deGroup One 25.to domains +0%

82 H

helloserver.winindependent 25.to domains +0%

83 T

tinyurl.comindependent 25.to domains −3.8%

84 N

ns.deindependent 25.to domains +8.7%

85 O

ovh.comindependent 24.to domains +14.3%

86 H

hostnet.nlGroup One 23.to domains −4.2%

87 L

loopia.seTeam Blue 23.to domains +0%

88 M

microsoft.comindependent 23.to domains +0%

89 1

1984.isindependent 22.to domains +4.8%

90 E

extrainfra.comindependent 22.to domains +0%

91 I

inetd.co.jpindependent 21.to domains +0%

92 N

nttpc.jpindependent 21.to domains −8.7%

93 G

gransy.comindependent 20.to domains +11.1%

94 D

dnsitalia.netindependent 20.to domains +0%

95 S

server.comindependent 20.to domains −9.1%

96 D

ddos-guard.netindependent 19.to domains +11.8%

97 W

webcentral.com.auWorld Host Group 19.to domains +0%

98 R

rackspace.comindependent 18.to domains +0%

99 E

eftydns.comindependent 18.to domains −10%

100 N

names.co.ukTeam Blue 18.to domains +0%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

66K

.to now

+849

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1kirklanddc.com+74.2%

2parklogic.com+42.8%

3godaddy.com+36%

4Above.com+21.6%

Losing ground

1giantpanda.com−59.3%

2parity.domains−22.1%

3parkingcrew.net−16.7%

4njalla.do−10.3%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.