.tw - Market Insights · Web Hosting Industry Portal

🇹🇼

.tw

ccTLD zone

105K

Zone size

890

Operators

Moderate

Concentration

Top operators in .tw by domains in the zone

1 C

cloudflare.comindependent 21K.tw domains +0.2%

2 G

godaddy.comGodaddy 18K.tw domains −1.8%

3 C

cht.com.twindependent 5K.tw domains −1.6%

4 D

DNS.comindependent 4K.tw domains −2.9%

5 D

dnsip.comindependent 4K.tw domains −4.1%

6 D

dynadot.comindependent 4K.tw domains +16.5%

7 X

xundns.comindependent 4K.tw domains −14.1%

8 G

gandi.netYour Online 3K.tw domains −3.6%

9 P

pchome.com.twindependent 3K.tw domains −1.7%

10 A

alibaba.comindependent 3K.tw domains +16.8%

11 C

cscglobal.comindependent 3K.tw domains −0.4%

12 N

net-chinese.com.twindependent 2K.tw domains +2%

13 G

Gname.comindependent 2K.tw domains −12.6%

14 A

Amazon Route 53independent 2K.tw domains −1%

15 M

markmonitor.comMarkmonitor Group 2K.tw domains +1.7%

16 S

seed.net.twindependent 1K.tw domains −1.1%

17 N

networksolutions.comNewfold Digital 973.tw domains −0.5%

18 T

twmail.orgindependent 753.tw domains −1.4%

19 D

Domain.comNewfold Digital 750.tw domains −1.3%

20 I

ix1000.comindependent 730.tw domains +1.5%

21 W

wix.comindependent 710.tw domains −3.4%

22 C

comlaude.comMarkmonitor Group 656.tw domains +2%

23 A

azure-dns.comindependent 612.tw domains +0%

24 U

united-domains.deUnited Internet 612.tw domains −1%

25 T

trademarkarea.comindependent 589.tw domains −1.3%

26 C

cloud.google.comindependent 570.tw domains +4%

27 N

Name.comIdentity Digital 523.tw domains +1.9%

28 O

ovh.comindependent 512.tw domains −2.5%

29 E

eurodns.comNamespace 489.tw domains −2.2%

30 O

onlydomains.comTeam Internet 473.tw domains −2.1%

31 N

netsto.netindependent 463.tw domains +1.3%

32 R

33 A

akamai.netindependent 432.tw domains −0.9%

34 H

hostinger.comindependent 408.tw domains −6.8%

35 N

nsone.netindependent 380.tw domains −4%

36 B

bluehost.comNewfold Digital 356.tw domains −1.4%

37 U

ultradns.netindependent 343.tw domains +2.1%

38 S

safenames.comindependent 337.tw domains +0%

39 I

iyp.com.twindependent 311.tw domains +0.6%

40 N

nameshield.netindependent 301.tw domains −2.6%

41 G

gabia.co.krindependent 294.tw domains −1.7%

42 C

coowo.comindependent 283.tw domains +8%

43 A

a2hosting.comWorld Host Group 280.tw domains −2.1%

44 B

brandshelter.comTeam Internet 280.tw domains −1.1%

45 P

pumo.com.twindependent 256.tw domains −0.4%

46 S

siteground.netindependent 251.tw domains −2%

47 P

parkingcrew.netindependent 228.tw domains −0.4%

48 I

icp100.netindependent 228.tw domains +10.1%

49 W

why3s.comindependent 222.tw domains −0.4%

50 W

wt500.comindependent 222.tw domains −0.9%

51 I

internetx.comUnited Internet 213.tw domains +2.4%

52 G

gmo.jpGmo Internet 211.tw domains −2.3%

53 D

dnspod.netindependent 203.tw domains +3.6%

54 S

sedo.comUnited Internet 166.tw domains −16.6%

55 P

Ports.netindependent 161.tw domains +0.6%

56 P

potia.netindependent 144.tw domains −0.7%

57 E

eranet.comindependent 142.tw domains −1.4%

58 N

nbcuni.comindependent 141.tw domains +1.4%

59 A

afraid.orgindependent 137.tw domains +1.5%

60 D

dnsxdp.comindependent 135.tw domains +938.5%

61 V

vercel.comindependent 132.tw domains +14.8%

62 O

onamae.comGmo Internet 128.tw domains −11.1%

63 N

ns.deindependent 126.tw domains +2.4%

64 H

hostgo.comindependent 121.tw domains +0.8%

65 W

WordPress.comindependent 120.tw domains +1.7%

66 T

tisnet.com.twindependent 120.tw domains −0.8%

67 D

domeneshop.noMiss Group 120.tw domains −2.4%

68 R

69 A

apple.comindependent 109.tw domains +13.5%

70 C

cloudns.netindependent 109.tw domains +3.8%

71 N

netim.netindependent 107.tw domains +3.9%

72 D

dreamhost.comindependent 106.tw domains −4.5%

73 N

newfold.comNewfold Digital 104.tw domains −3.7%

74 D

domaindiscount24.comTeam Internet 103.tw domains −4.6%

75 B

barbero.co.ukindependent 100.tw domains +0%

76 I

ionos.comUnited Internet 99.tw domains +5.3%

77 S

safebrands.frindependent 98.tw domains −1%

78 M

managed-ip.comindependent 98.tw domains +8.9%

79 M

microsoft.comindependent 98.tw domains −3%

80 D

digitalocean.comindependent 94.tw domains −2.1%

81 W

whoisdomain.krindependent 93.tw domains −3.1%

82 X

xserver.jpNetowl 93.tw domains −7.9%

83 D

domainoo.frindependent 90.tw domains −1.1%

84 W

webdsn.netindependent 89.tw domains +0%

85 B

bosch.deindependent 88.tw domains +0%

86 P

porkbun.comindependent 87.tw domains −22.3%

87 I

iptwins.netindependent 85.tw domains +0%

88 H

hostgator.coNewfold Digital 85.tw domains −9.6%

89 I

inwx.chindependent 85.tw domains +0%

90 D

dnsmadeeasy.comIdentity Digital 84.tw domains +0%

91 D

dipcon.comindependent 83.tw domains +1.2%

92 N

nadns1.frindependent 82.tw domains +6.5%

93 D

dnslah.comindependent 80.tw domains +8.1%

94 A

Above.comindependent 79.tw domains −16.8%

95 T

twnic.twindependent 78.tw domains +1.3%

96 W

west.cnindependent 78.tw domains −15.2%

97 N

namecheap.comNamecheap 77.tw domains −8.3%

98 Y

yahoo.comindependent 76.tw domains −2.6%

99 L

lexsynergy.netindependent 76.tw domains −2.6%

100 S

server.comindependent 67.tw domains +6.3%

Zone momentum domains in zone · 12 months

105K

.tw now

-849

Net / month

Fast movers 30d · % change

Fastest growing

1dnsxdp.com+938.5%

2alibaba.com+16.8%

3dynadot.com+16.5%

4vercel.com+14.8%

Losing ground

1porkbun.com−22.3%

2Above.com−16.8%

3sedo.com−16.6%

4west.cn−15.2%

About this data

How it is collected. Market Insights is built entirely from publicly observable data: domains seen across the internet and the DNS servers that answer for them. We attribute each domain to a provider based on the DNS infrastructure serving it, and aggregate those signals into the figures shown here.

Why it can differ from reality. This is an automated estimate, not an official registry. A provider’s real footprint can be higher or lower than shown, especially when it does not use its own DNS servers to host customer domains (for example, when those domains sit on a registrar’s, reseller’s or third-party cloud DNS). Coverage, timing and DNS configuration all affect what we can see.

The tool is neutral and provided “as is”. The same automated method is applied to every provider, with no manual ranking, no favoritism and no paid placement. These figures are published for informational purposes only, without any warranty of accuracy or completeness, and we accept no liability for any discrepancies or for decisions made based on this data.

Think a company is under-counted? We’d genuinely like to fix it. Send us your domain list or report your DNS servers, and we’ll review the attribution.